The Sun’ll come out tomorrow, and you no longer have to bet your bottom dollar to be sure of it. Google’s DeepMind team released its latest weather prediction model this week, which outperforms a leading traditional weather prediction model across the vast majority of tests put before it.
Where GenCast departs from other diffusion models is that it (obviously) is weather-focused, and “adapted to the spherical geometry of the Earth,” as described by a couple of the paper’s co-authors in a DeepMind blog post.
Traditional weather prediction models like ENS, the leading model from the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, make their forecasts by solving physics equations.
The first seeds of GenCast were planted in 2022, but the model published this week includes architectural changes and an improved diffusion setup that made the model better trained to predict weather on Earth, including extreme weather events, up to 15 days out.
Google has been tooling around with weather prediction for a while, and in recent years have made a couple substantive steps towards more precise forecasting using AI methods.
The resolution achieved by GenCast is roughly six times that of NeuralGCM, but that was expected. “NeuralGCM is designed as a general purpose atmospheric model primarily to support climate modelling, whereas the higher resolution of GenCast is often expected for operational medium range forecast models, which is GenCast’s specific target use-case,” Price added. “This is also why we emphasized a wide range of evaluations which are crucial use cases for operational medium range forecasts, like predicting extreme weather.”
In the recent work, the team trained GenCast on historical weather data through 2018, and then tested the model’s ability to predict weather patterns in 2019. GenCast outperformed ENS on 97.2% of targets using different weather variables, with varying lead times before the weather event; with lead times greater than 36 hours, GenCast was more accurate than ENS on 99.8% of targets.
The team also tested GenCast’s ability to forecast the track of a tropical cyclone—specifically Typhoon Hagibis, the costliest tropical cyclone of 2019, which hit Japan that October. GenCast’s predictions were highly uncertain with seven days of lead time, but became more accurate at shorter lead times. As extreme weather generates wetter, heavier rainfall, and hurricanes break records for how quickly they intensify and how early in the season they form, accurate prediction of storm paths will be crucial in mitigating their fiscal and human costs.
“The development of GenCast, a machine learning weather prediction (MLWP) model, marks a significant milestone in the evolution of weather forecasting, as highlighted in the recent Google DeepMind paper,” said an ECMWF spokesperson, in an emailed statement to Gizmodo. “GenCast is one of the latest machine learning models reviewed in a series of high-profile scientific papers about MLWP coming from around the globe, which highlight the ongoing (r)evolution in weather forecasting.”
The ECMWF statement pointed out that the GenCast paper also compared the model’s performance to ENS 11-mile (18-kilometer) resolution. Now five years later, ENS runs at a 5.6-mile (9 km) resolution. “The GenCast paper presents innovative science from a machine learning point of view, but these improvements have got to be tested on how well they perform in extreme weather events to fully appreciate their value,” the statement concluded.
“This will enable the wider research and meteorological community to engage with, test, run, and build on our work, accelerating further advances in the field,” Price said. “We have finetuned versions of GenCast to be able to take operational inputs, and so the model could start to be incorporated in operational setting.”
There is not yet a timeline on when GenCast and other models will be operational, though the DeepMind blog noted that the models are “starting to power user experiences on Google Search and Maps.”
12/6 3pm: This story has been updated to include comments from ECMWF.
Disclaimer
The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.
The South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service.
In no event shall the South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice.
The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components