Home Business Report: Taxpayer-supported Broward Health engaged in ‘cultural civil war’

Report: Taxpayer-supported Broward Health engaged in ‘cultural civil war’

taxpayer-supported

The law firm that’s overseeing taxpayer-supported Broward Health’s compliance with conditions imposed by the U.S. last year when it paid $70 million to resolve alleged lawbreaking has concluded the troubled hospital district is in a state of “cultural civil war.”

Baker Donelson was hired in December to serve as the “Independent Review Organization” (IRO) under the terms of a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement between the North Broward Hospital District (NBHD) – Broward Health’s legal name – and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The IRO’s 137-page annual report, obtained by Florida Bulldog using Florida’s Public Records Law, lays out what it says are Broward Health’s “numerous systems deficiencies” while also defending itself from anonymous, yet widely distributed accusations that it was not truly independent and was hired thanks to insider connections.

The report, often citing unnamed sources, is highly critical of Broward Health’s recently departed Chief Compliance Officer Donna Lewis for refusing to produce, among other things, requested information about employee complaints. Also singled out for criticism: Broward Health’s Interim CEO Pauline Grant and Chief Information Officer Doris Peek, who, along with Lewis, are accused of planting “negative articles regarding the IRO in the local media.”

Faith Based Events
[vc_btn title=”More on Broward Health ” style=”outline” color=”primary” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fwww.floridabulldog.org%2F2016%2F10%2Ftaxpayer-supported-broward-health-engaged-in-cultural-civil-war%2F|title:More%20on%20Broward%20Health%20|target:%20_blank|”][vc_message message_box_style=”3d” message_box_color=”turquoise”]By Dan Christensen, FloridaBulldog.org, Special to SouthFloridaReporter.com Oct. 24, 2016 

Additonal ‘Broward Health’ stories can be found here[/vc_message]


Disclaimer

The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.
The South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service.
In no event shall the South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice.
The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components