
WRITTEN BY: KATHLEEN WILLCOX
But in practice, they can be attached to anything from the esoteric and abstract (digital perfume, or a symphony of farts, for example) to the serious and tangible (a Beeple artwork sold for $69.3 million, or a house that sold for $653,000).
The first NFT emerged in 2014, but the market wasn’t mainstreamed until 2020-21, and about 70% of Americans still don’t really understand what an NFT is. But the $22 billion NFT market has drawn increased interest from the world of wine, largely for two reasons: 1) it appeals to the type of consumer (younger, more affluent than average) it is often accused of failing to adequately engage and 2) it ensures proof of authenticity.
In the past year or so, several bold-faced wineries have debuted NFTs, from Robert Mondavi, to Yao Family Wines, to Chateau Angelus and Penfolds. (Read our piece on Mondavi’s drop here). There’s even the World’s First NFT Wine Club, although our attempt to reach out and get more information not shared in the low-on-details high-on-hype press release was met with an ultimately nonresponsive bot.
So we reached out to flesh-and-blood wine experts for their take on whether NFTs and wine are the future of wine, or just a flash in the pan.
Targeting New Demographic + Buzz
“NFTs appeal to a younger generation in the same way any new technology does,” says attorney Asher Rubinstein, a partner at Manhattan’s Gallet Dreyer & Berkey and a member of the Wine, Beer and Spirits Law Committee at the New York State Bar Association. “NFTs are also huge buzz generators. When you have established wineries like Mondavi and Angelus doing NFTs, even if they aren’t instant sell-outs, it will bring attention to these brands from a younger generation that may not even have them on their radar.”
Fraud Prevention + The Future
Fraud in the wine industry, as Selles alluded to, is a scourge—an estimated $3 billion one at that. Many see NFTs as the only way to combat fraud, while simultaneously allowing both producers and consumers to invest in future profits, today. “NFTs lock authenticity in on the blockchain,” says Rubenstein. “That means buyers can trace ownership of a bottle from the beginning, something that has never been possible before. But there are so many other things that can be written into the code too. If Napa’s Screaming Eagle, say, writes that they get residuals in perpetuity every time that NFT-linked bottle is sold, they will get just that.” So that $500,000 bottle of 1992 that sold in 2000? Screaming Eagle didn’t see a penny of it but could potentially if it’s in the code.
Rubinstein also sees an opportunity a la Bordeaux futures for the NFT. “A barrel of wine contains dozens of cases,” Rubinstein notes. “You could create NFTs that allow for fractional ownership that you could then sell later. Anything can be written into the code.”
But not everyone is convinced that NFTs will resolve the vexing issues of fraud. “From my view, I still don’t think cryptocurrency, which is linked to NFTs, will make it, but it’s gotten a lot further than I thought it would,” says Rob McMillan, executive vice president and founder of Silicon Valley Bank’s wine division. “I still just can’t see governments allowing a secondary uncontrolled financial system. China has already clamped down on it. It’s too convenient of a place to launder criminal transactions.” And if crypto gets regulated, McMillan believes it will lose its inherent appeal. “I’d say blockchain technology does have a potential place in protecting the provenance of collectible things like art and wine,” he says.
But while NFTs are blockchain-based, the blockchain exists beyond the realm of NFTs. Only time will tell where the market settles, but clearly, a more digital future is upon us for the world of wine making, selling, investing and collecting.
Republished with permission by SouthFloridaReporter.com on Mar. 8, 2022[/vc_message]
Disclaimer
The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.
The South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service.
In no event shall the South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice.
The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components