Home Consumer Supreme Court Upholds Regulation of ‘Ghost Guns’

Supreme Court Upholds Regulation of ‘Ghost Guns’

A 9mm ‘ghost gun’ build kit (PHOTO: CAROLYN KASTER/ASSOCIATED PRESS)

By Jess Bravin

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court held Wednesday that federal firearms laws cover so-called ghost guns, weapons that are assembled from kits that law enforcement says are becoming the go-to choice for armed criminals.

The gun industry had challenged a Biden-era regulation treating ghost guns like other firearms, with the same licensing, background checks and serial number requirements. A federal appeals court in New Orleans had set aside the regulation, reasoning that weapons parts aren’t weapons and thus weren’t covered by the Gun Control Act of 1968.

On Wednesday, a 7-2 Supreme Court disagreed. At least some gun kits fit the definition that Congress set out, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the court, and therefore the regulation stands. The court left open the possibility that some kits might be so far from a finished gun as to fall outside the regulation.

Faith Based Events

The Gun Control Act, passed in the wake of the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., responded to a wave of violence then wracking the nation. It imposed record-keeping requirements to help police solve gun crimes, and used specific language to define what qualifies as a covered weapon, including items “that may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive” and “the frame or receiver of any such weapon.”

That expansive definition “has long been understood to reach everything from run-of-the-mill rifles to novelty umbrella guns,” Gorsuch wrote. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was within the law’s scope when in 2022 it determined that covered weapons included kits that can “readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,” he added.

Continue reading


Disclaimer

The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.
The South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service.
In no event shall the South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice.
The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components