Home Consumer WATCH: Trump Response to Supreme Court Ruling

WATCH: Trump Response to Supreme Court Ruling

Here’s the live link:  https://www.whitehouse.gov/live/

 

Trump Blasts Supreme Court “Disgrace” After Major Defeat on Global Tariffs

President Trump labels the ruling a disgrace and promises a backup plan after the Court strikes down his tariffs.


WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a rare and stinging rebuke to his executive authority, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Donald Trump exceeded his legal bounds by imposing sweeping global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The decision, which upends the cornerstone of the administration’s “America First” economic agenda, prompted an immediate and fiery response from the President, who labeled the judiciary’s move a “disgrace.”

Faith Based Events

The ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, clarifies that the power to tax and regulate commerce belongs fundamentally to Congress under Article I of the Constitution. “The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,” Roberts wrote for the majority. While the President’s three appointees—Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—were split, with Kavanaugh joining Alito and Thomas in dissent, the Court ultimately held that the 1977 law intended for national emergencies could not be used as a “blank check” for permanent trade policy.

The President’s Reaction

President Trump reportedly learned of the decision while in a private meeting with several governors. According to sources familiar with the exchange, the President grew visibly frustrated after being handed a note detailing the loss.

“This is a disgrace to our country,” Trump later told reporters during a hastily arranged press conference. “I’ve been waiting forever for this decision, and the language is clear that I have the right to do it as President. We have a backup plan, a ‘Game Two’ plan, and we will not let our workers be cheated by foreign countries just because of a few judges who don’t understand the real world.”

The President’s “backup plan” likely involves pivoting to alternative legal justifications, such as Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act (national security) or Section 301 of the Trade Act (unfair trade practices). However, legal experts warn that these avenues may also face intense litigation following the precedent set today.

Economic and Political Fallout

The ruling has immediate fiscal implications. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) estimates that the loss of tariff revenue could increase projected federal deficits by approximately $2 trillion over the next decade. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders and several Republican “free trade” advocates celebrated the decision as a victory for the separation of powers.

“The Supreme Court today confirmed that the President is not a king,” said Representative Gregory Meeks, Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the ruling places the administration in a precarious position. Trump had framed these tariffs as essential for domestic manufacturing, while critics pointed to an AP-NORC poll showing that 76% of Americans feared the policies were driving up the cost of consumer goods.


Sources

 

 


Disclaimer

Artificial Intelligence Disclosure & Legal Disclaimer

AI Content Policy.

To provide our readers with timely and comprehensive coverage, South Florida Reporter uses artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in producing certain articles and visual content.

Articles: AI may be used to assist in research, structural drafting, or data analysis. All AI-assisted text is reviewed and edited by our team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our editorial standards.

Images: Any imagery generated or significantly altered by AI is clearly marked with a disclaimer or watermark to distinguish it from traditional photography or editorial illustrations.

General Disclaimer

The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.

South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service. In no event shall South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service.

The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice. The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components.