
Happy National Nutrition Month! With Americans collectively spending up to $315.8 billion annually on obesity-related medical treatment, the personal finance website WalletHub took an in-depth look at 2016’s Fattest Cities in America.
In order to call attention to the communities where weight-related problems are most prevalent, WalletHub’s analysts compared 100 of the most populated U.S. metro areas across 14 key metrics. They range from “percentage of adults and high school students who are obese” to “percentage of people who are physically inactive.”
Fattest Metro Areas | Thinnest Metro Areas | ||||
1 | Memphis, TN | 91 | Tucson, AZ | ||
2 | Shreveport, LA | 92 | Denver, CO | ||
3 | Indianapolis, IN | 93 | Colorado Springs, CO | ||
4 | Jackson, MS | 94 | San Francisco, CA | ||
5 | New Orleans, LA | 95 | Boston, MA | ||
6 | Chattanooga, TN | 96 | Sacramento, CA | ||
7 | Mobile, AL | 97 | Las Vegas, NV | ||
8 | San Antonio, TX | 98 | Boise, ID | ||
9 | Greenville, SC | 99 | Reno, NV | ||
10 | Little Rock, AR | 100 | Honolulu, HI |
Comparing the Fattest & Thinnest
- The Memphis, TN-MS-AR, metro area has the highest percentage of obese adults, 36.8 percent, which is two times higher than in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, the metro area with the lowest, 18.9 percent.
- The Memphis, TN-MS-AR, metro area has the highest percentage of physically inactive adults, 34.7 percent, which is three times higher than in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, the metro area with the lowest, 14.1 percent.
- The Canton-Massillon, OH, metro area has the highest percentage of diabetic adults, 15.4 percent, which is three times higher than in Provo-Orem, UT, the metro area with the lowest, 5.0 percent.
- The Mobile, AL, metro area has the highest percentage of adults with high blood pressure, 42.5 percent, which is two times higher than in Provo-Urem, UT, the metro area with the lowest, 19.5 percent.
By Richie Bernardo for a WalletHub News Release for SouthFloridaReporter.com, Mar. 24, 2016
[/vc_message]Disclaimer
The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.
The South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service.
In no event shall the South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice.
The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components