Candidates For Judge Running Solely To Boost Their Incomes?

judicial

It is election time and the Broward Courthouse crowd is grumbling once again that too many candidates for judge are running for the wrong reasons.

The complaint is that lawyers run for judge to improve their finances rather than to improve the judiciary. The subtext of this argument is that candidates who need to become judges to boost their incomes are not Broward’s best and most accomplished lawyers.

Below are the incomes of the four Broward Circuit Court candidates now running for two open seats on the Broward Circuit Court.

The candidate’s reported income:

Faith Based Events

Group 9

  • Andrea Gundersen’s 2015 salary — $86,325
  • Lea Krauss’s 2015 salary — $94,369

Group 15

  • Barbara Duffy’s 2015 salary — $50,000
  • Abbe Rifkin’s 2015 salary — $140,256

The election winner can expect to earn roughly $145,000 annually, plus generous retirement and health benefits as a Circuit Court judge. Thus Rifkin is the only candidate that will not be receiving a big boost in salary if she wins.

None of the candidates are exceedingly wealthy for veteran lawyers. Their net worth’s are:

Group 9

  • Gundersen: $746,312
  • Krauss: $560,000

Group 15

  • Duffy: $459,763
  • Rifkin: $445,603

Gundersen has the largest net worth, but she is the oldest at 60.

Rifkin is 59, but if the only one of the four candidates who works for government. She’s a Miami-Dade homicide prosecutor.

Duffy, 50, was a prosecutor and is now in private practice. Krauss, 41, is also in private practice.

So are the candidates’ running for a better salary? You decide.

[vc_message message_box_style=”3d” message_box_color=”turquoise”]By Buddy Nevins, BrowardBeat.com, excerpt posted on SouthFloridaReporter.com Sept. 20, 2016[/vc_message]

Disclaimer

The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.
The South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service.
In no event shall the South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice.
The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components