
In a stunning reversal that has reignited a firestorm over government transparency and data privacy, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a court disclosure Friday admitting that members of the President’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) embedded at the Social Security Administration (SSA) bypassed federal protocols, accessed sensitive data without authorization, and coordinated with a partisan advocacy group.
The filing, submitted in ongoing litigation, confirms that DOGE staffers engaged in a “Voter Data Agreement” with an outside organization and utilized unapproved third-party servers to store and transmit the personal information of millions of Americans.
Bypassing the Guardrails
According to the court documents, the SSA determined that in early March 2025, two members of the agency’s DOGE team were contacted by a political advocacy group seeking assistance in analyzing state voter rolls. The group’s stated goal was to identify “voter fraud” and challenge election outcomes in several states.
The DOJ admitted that at least one DOGE staffer, acting in their capacity as a federal employee, signed a formal agreement with the group. This coordination occurred without the knowledge or approval of the SSA’s career leadership or its data exchange oversight boards. While the administration maintained that it has not yet found definitive proof that the data was successfully handed over to the group, the admission that such an agreement existed represents a significant breach of the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity while on duty.
The “Shadow” Servers
The disclosure further details a “vulnerable cloud environment” and the use of unapproved servers to handle the most sensitive data in the U.S. government—the Numerical Identification System (NUMIDENT). This database contains the Social Security numbers, names, birth dates, and addresses of nearly every American.
The filing reveals that DOGE staffers used Cloudflare—a third-party service not authorized for Social Security data—to share encrypted, password-protected files. SSA’s Chief Information Office admitted it has been unable to access these files to determine their exact contents or whether the data still exists on those external servers.
“These actions constitute a gross mismanagement of authority and a substantial threat to public safety,” stated a whistleblower complaint previously filed by Charles Borges, the SSA’s former Chief Data Officer.
Borges, who was sidelined after raising alarms about these practices, had warned that DOGE was operating a “shadow” IT infrastructure that lacked independent security monitoring, leaving the personal records of over 300 million people at risk of identity theft or foreign hacking.
Hunting for “Fraud”
The revelation of the “voter data agreement” connects the DOGE team’s efficiency mission to the administration’s broader efforts to challenge election integrity. Critics have long argued that the efficiency task force was a “fishing expedition” for political leverage.
The court filing indicates that DOGE personnel were actively trying to match SSA’s “death master file” and non-citizen records against state voter registration lists. Earlier in the year, billionaire Elon Musk and other administration officials claimed to have found “millions of dead people” receiving benefits—a claim that career SSA officials quickly debunked as a misunderstanding of how the agency codes its historical records.
Political and Legal Fallout
The DOJ has now referred at least two DOGE employees to the Office of Special Counsel for potential Hatch Act violations. Meanwhile, Congressional Democrats and privacy advocates are calling for an immediate audit of all DOGE activities across the federal government.
“This is not about efficiency; it is about weaponizing the most private information of the American people for political gain,” said Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) in response to the filing. “To have unvetted staffers signing agreements with political groups while holding the keys to our Social Security data is an abhorrent violation of the public trust.”
As the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals prepares to rule on whether to reinstate an injunction against DOGE’s data access, the administration remains under intense pressure to account for exactly how much information was moved to outside servers and who, ultimately, was given the password to the encrypted files.
Sources & Links
- Democracy Docket: DOGE worked with political group to probe voter rolls, Trump admin admits
- The Washington Post: Trump administration admits DOGE accessed personal Social Security data
- Government Accountability Project: Whistleblower claims DOGE compromised Social Security data
- Silicon Angle: Court filings raise questions over DOGE access to SSA data
- U.S. Senate (Committee on Homeland Security): Peters Report Finds DOGE Likely Violating Federal Privacy and Security Laws
Disclaimer
Artificial Intelligence Disclosure & Legal Disclaimer
AI Content Policy.
To provide our readers with timely and comprehensive coverage, South Florida Reporter uses artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in producing certain articles and visual content.
Articles: AI may be used to assist in research, structural drafting, or data analysis. All AI-assisted text is reviewed and edited by our team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our editorial standards.
Images: Any imagery generated or significantly altered by AI is clearly marked with a disclaimer or watermark to distinguish it from traditional photography or editorial illustrations.
General Disclaimer
The information contained in South Florida Reporter is for general information purposes only.
South Florida Reporter assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service. In no event shall South Florida Reporter be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service.
The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents of the Service at any time without prior notice. The Company does not warrant that the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components.









